The King List or the DNA

Analysis of the Remote Viewing Sessions Part 2

Bild von Gerd Altmann auf Pixabay

Changing historiography in the DNA

Rewriting history means destroying all knowledge that can be found anywhere.

Starting with the destruction of hieroglyphics, so that only desired knowledge can be traced, up to the burning of books.

But what about the largest library of knowledge we have - our DNA?

Only 2 percent of our DNA is open, which means that we only actively read and use two percent of it for our bodies. The remaining 98 percent is considered junk DNA.

Let's remember the prehistoric code - which completely overturns genetic research. From the year 1988.

This article reveals the secret of a sensational biological discovery at the pharmaceutical giant Ciba (Novartis): In laboratory experiments, researchers there had exposed grain and fish eggs to an “electrostatic field” -- that is, a simple high-voltage field in which no current flows. The result: growth and yield were massively increased in this way! At the same time, “prehistoric forms” that have long since become extinct grew in a completely surprising way. The pharmaceutical company patented the revolutionary process -- and stopped the research. Why? Because, unlike modern seed varieties, “ancient cereals” from the electric field require hardly any pesticides -- i.e. plant protection products of the kind that Ciba primarily marketed at the time.

The discovery was forgotten - without the scientific community taking any notice of it.

Please use English subtitles - these recordings are not available in English.

Part 1 - in the year 1988

Part 2 - 20 years later

Let's summarize briefly:

This simple process opens up old sections of the gene, which brings to light a resurgence of old forms.

Our DNA is also a history book - the story of our evolution. The question that arises here is what actually happens when our DNA is deliberately altered or parts of it are deliberately blocked?

Is this not a much bigger forgetting or does it perhaps even set us back in our evolution?

Even if technology is advertised as if it were the golden egg. Technology is always a replica of nature and does not come close to it.

We can see from this article by the Max Plank Society that genes from junk DNA can be combined to form new genes

Junk DNA becomes new genes

For the first time, scientists have discovered a “de novo gene” that was created in a previously functionless DNA segment

However, the open sections only ever remain at this low percentage.

Why is that?

The answer can be found in Prof. Dr. Konstantin Meyl. He has long been “featherbedded” for his views, as he himself describes it. However, more and more publications from recognized institutes are confirming his views. But as is so often the case, the actual discoverer is not mentioned.

According to this, junk DNA works as follows: Biological information transfer is based on the resonance principle. DNA is geometrically structured like an antenna. This communication takes place via the so-called magnetic scalar wave.

According to his research, the principle of information modulation works in exactly the opposite way to how we use it in radio technology. In biology, high-frequency information is modulated onto a low-frequency wave.

The explanation is also obvious. The electromagnetic wave that oscillates transversely to the propagation has an energy density of zero, which corresponds to an angle of zero degrees, which means no energy transfer, which is what the cell needs. The principle is similar to serial image transmission - a pixel structure. Only when I remember something, the image does not build up pixel by pixel - it is there immediately. But for this I need parallel image transmission. This is not constant in its propagation, but has a 90 degree angle and transports energy!!!

The individual particles only oscillate in place and therefore the frequency and wavelength can be modulated differently from each other.

Back to resonance. Cells that go into resonance must

1. have the same frequency

2. Have an opposite phase position

3. Have the same waveform or modulation

With a percentage of 98, the antenna transmission of the introns is guaranteed and the remaining 2 percent of information can be “dragged along”. There are no better antenna functions. There is no such thing as 100 percent efficiency. Nature, and therefore our DNA, has already found the best solution throughout the history of evolution.

And finally, let's take a look at the classic Roebel bar:

It represents a special splitting of a rod-shaped electrical conductor into several parallel partial conductors. These partial conductors are insulated from each other and specially layered. Such a specific and precisely defined twist is used in particular for high-power electrical machines and serves to reduce the effects of an increase in resistance when alternating current is supplied - caused by the current displacement generated by the slot leakage field or slot transverse field (known as the skin effect in high-frequency stranded conductors).

And now let's look at the same DNA distortion:

Bild von Clker-Free-Vector-Images auf Pixabay

The Roebel Wand follows the example of DNA.

In Sasha's Remote Viewing session, we often talked about the history of a King's List - which we were able to identify as DNA. We carry the book of life within us - in every single cell.

Also striking here were the colors green and blue - the same colors that are used in the LaserCube.

LaserCube - Assembly aid

Hyroglyphs can be replaced, books can be reprinted, but if our important antenna for the transmission of vital information or the passing on of evolutionary history is wiped out - what then?

In this context, I would like to reiterate the importance of nanogold.

Gold nanoparticles insert themselves directly into the DNA within the helix. Normally we don't have gold nanoparticles in our blood - colloidal gold does - but not in nano form.

The DNA is negatively charged, like gold - magnesium ions play the role of mediator and voila - the connection is there.

Ann Fornof shows what impact the new method could have in nanotechnology:

“The possibility of binding individual pieces of DNA to a surface in a controlled manner from the outside offers a new tool for building nanostructures or specifically immobilizing DNA. It is quite conceivable that this electrically controlled adhesion will be useful for a range of applications: from use in biosensors to the positioning of larger constructs such as DNA origami.”

Origami technique - see here -

This confirms once again that nanoproducts support the construction of technology. Colloidal gold, on the other hand, can help against structural build-up, but in nano form the substances simply behave completely differently.

Just because it says nano on it doesn't make it better.

Perhaps this technology can also be used to our advantage - but unfortunately this is not the case at the moment.

Here is the trailer for the target H6DG-T9FE, even though it is already in the last mail. Sasha's and David's data show an enormous number of correlations and complex data sets, so it will probably take some time until we have really understood and worked out everything.

You can find them both at https://www.patreon.com/magicinthenoise.

I have set up a Telegram channel - where I post new images from darkfield microscopy. If you would like to browse through new pictures in between, you are welcome to register.

SAM’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

You are welcome to book a subscription for the Remote Viewings directly at:

For your help and support here on Substack you will also get access to my Future Targets, Extra Targets and the first blueprint for the LaserCube on my website.

Bitcoin QR-Code