10 Comments

Hi Silvia,

This is something I found a while back that made sense to me.

"But how could this have happened since neither graphene or graphene oxide are magnetic? The answer is that both graphene and graphene oxide, can conduct enough electricity across the cell membranes to magnetise nearby superparamagnetic particles such as ferritin and magnetite to cause a widespread magnetisation of people receiving the vaccine.

It's just as the iron core of an electromagnet becomes magnetised when an electric current is passed through the coil of wire wound around it.

To make this argument more quantitative; the electrical conductivity of graphene on the nano scale is two orders of magnitude greater than copper See here

What does this mean for living cells?

The answer is that the transmembrane voltage gradient of living cells is of the order of ten million volts per metre (100 mV across a 10 nm membrane). This means that a transmembrane strand of graphene or graphene oxide (from the vaccine) could carry a huge electric current and be likely to magnetise any superparamagnetic materials such as ferritin or magnetite that may be close by.

This effect could spread like wildfire across the membrane as each magnetized particle magnetizes its neighbours and then to those of the next cell, so that the magnetic effect increases and ultimately, it could spread to all parts of the body via the bloodstream, starting with the blood cells themselves, including those white cells needed for our immune system, then the veins, then the heart, followed by the lungs and finally the brain.

Wherever It goes, it could wreak havoc with cell permeability and have all sorts of biological effects, including heart failure, premature Alzeimer's disease and, when the mitochondria are affected, chronic fatigue. Another effect is that membrane damage to our sensory cells could make them hyperactive and send false signals to the brain to give symptoms very similar to electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) resulting in headaches whenever we use a mobile phone, pins and needles when straying too close to a WiFi router dizziness and nausea, to name but a few. Perhaps the most serious danger is if you have an MRI scan, when the extremely powerful magnet in the machine would try to pull these magnetised particles out of your body and, in the case of the brain or spinal cord scan, immediate and possibly permanent damage could result. When other parts of the body are scanned, the results may be less noticeable in the short term, but become apparent later as an unexplained "idiopathic" illness. This needs careful monitoring by an independent observer."

Best wishes,

Dr Andrew Goldsworthy Lecturer and Biological Safety Officer (retired) Imperial College London

Expand full comment
author
Feb 12Author

That makes sense. Maybe you've already found these implant videos - where they use megaphones to search for individual implants. Another observation I have made is that if you have only found one implant and leave the sound on for a longer period of time, the whole body is active after a short time, i.e. you can hold the megaphone wherever you want, everything reacts. This could have something to do with the process you described, i.e. that a proper resonance is triggered in the whole body at the same time. In other words, if the contamination of the body is high enough with these graphene substances and the cell membranes act as "cables" to the entire body - all you need are the corresponding resonance bodies that are lying around everywhere. These could possibly be the barium strontium titanate crystals that have been built into our nervous system for years. At the same time, the process you described would release enough energy that is necessary for the quantum dots to function. They definitely draw energy from the immediate living environment. If everything is dead - the things come to a standstill, not before. There will be an article on this in the next few days. Great input! Thank you!

Expand full comment

I am not sure the idea of high current from transmembrane conductors works. Having a high voltage doesn't mean that it can generate more than a transient current. If you "short out" the membrane potential, it would quickly drain that relatively small charge, but to have continued current, somehow that potential would need to be maintained, which would require a lot of energy and a mechanism to do so. My guess would be that you get a small blip of current and kill the cell, since that potential probably serves an important purpose.

Perhaps a more subtle approach could work, siphoning off small amounts of charge from many cells?

Expand full comment
author
Feb 12Author

A small amount of charge from many cells sounds plausible. I'll have to think about it...

Thanks for the tip.

Expand full comment
Feb 12Liked by SAM

So the black crystals that liquefy in low pH are mesogens?

Expand full comment

They also disassembe in the presence of Nano/mono gold particles and colloidal gold. I have hypothesis that Nano gold of 14nm attached to CBD and THC, interfere and have disassembly affect. As shown by Dr Nixon with colloidal gold.

Once the mesogen is encased in genetically manipulated tissue, which forms a small tumour. This foreign tissue seems to protect the mesogen chips from the Nano/mono/colloidal gold though... As my logic chip didn't die till I was hit real hard by 6G satellite. I died and came back... It use to grow back, with EMF exposure, still hasn't.

Expand full comment
author
Feb 14Author

How did you come up with 14nm nanogold in particular?

Expand full comment

I had a knowing, so I looked and found it in medical journals on cannabis medicine.

Expand full comment
author
Feb 14·edited Feb 14Author

We were able to notice that gold itself shields, making it more difficult to control certain areas. Then I'll do some tests with blood and gold. Maybe there's something to see. And welcome back - someone else who's been over there before...

Additionally, I think this technology has been in use for a lot longer - and I'm starting to wonder how many tumors have or have had implants trapped inside.

Expand full comment
author
Feb 12Author

Looks like it. I'm no expert, but the information I've received from others doesn't allow any other conclusion.

Expand full comment