Fractal art and its similarity to the fibers and structures in blood
Fractal analysis as cancer diagnostics and quantum entanglement of the LaserCube
Back in 2013, the Max Planck Institute developed a method for fractal cancer detection that focuses on the geometry of the cancer cell.
Max Planck Institute and
Malignant and healthy cells exhibit characteristic fractal patterns by which they can be distinguished.
The more frayed, the more malignant: a tumor cell can be identified by its fractal geometry, or rather its degree of fractality. The cell on the right has a higher degree of fractality than the cell on the left, which is an indication of its greater aggressiveness
According to the explanations of Dr. Vera C. Hirschfeld-Warneken, Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
The methods of tumor diagnosis are not only very time-consuming and costly, but are often ambiguous, not standardized and the metastasis potential and thus the quality of the prognosis are only indirectly determined. A small solid tumor that is highly aggressive can therefore be wrongly classified as low malignant and patients are not treated optimally.
The method mentioned here is based on the fractal analysis of adhesion patterns of cancer cells. Fractals are patterns that are repeated at different size levels - one speaks of self-similarity and scale independence. The closer one zooms into the patterns, the more details can be recognized.
The development of cancer is seen here as a deviation from equilibrium structures, which generates a higher degree of chaos and thus complexity in the system. This applies at the level of tumor morphology down to intracellular compartments such as the cell nucleus and correlates with the aggressiveness of the tumor.
Fractals are calculated with the help of curves. A point is created where the curves intersect. These collected intersections create whole fabric-like fields and structures.
The interesting thing here is that if we use two curves, insect-like images are always created. If we use three curves, as with triangulation, complete natural-looking images are created.
Here is an example:
A closer look reveals fiber-like structures and their veil formation - and we compare this with the structures we find in blood: (Magnification 1000x)
This comparison clearly suggests that the radiation from outside, i.e. from cell phone towers or whatever, is the result of a targeted fractal calculation. And one tower is not enough. It has to be a coordinated network that works together.
In cancer detection by fractal determination, attention is paid to the exact pattern. If new fractal patterns appear in our body as a result of radiation, the body pattern is disturbed. Disturbances in the fractal pattern, however, mean the development of cancer.
So here again we have a geometry that is crucial for maintaining health. However, since nanotechnology requires its own new geometry, we are faced with a dilemma.
Fractals are based on a spatial cube. And here we are back to the LaserCube.
My post about the salt crystal showed that the original structure of the salt crystal can be restored by “treating” it with the LaserCube. And since the salt crystal is our most important liquid crystal in the blood - and a change in its structure is likely to be one of the causes of many problems - stabilizing this crystal is an important part of maintaining our health. Likewise our resulting fractal structure, or health.
Due to these correlations, we have decided to use a different strategy with the LaserCube.
Individual treatments are only short interruptions in the permanent irradiation mode to which we are exposed. This is like a drop in the ocean.
But as soon as there is a drop of blood in the cube - even without irradiation - the test subjects react with a clear change in the way they feel. All of them spoke of a much clearer head and felt better.
Irradiation with the green and blue/violet lasers brought about an improvement over a longer period of time, but not as dramatic as I would have hoped. The irradiation time was also only 5 - 20 minutes per session.
Even with daily use, it takes a long time for the blood count to show any results. With the exception of the subjective effects - these were always there immediately and lasted for a few hours.
We therefore switched to a different test and built another cube for the normal radiation sessions, without open corners, and put a blood sample in there each time, which now remains there for 24 hours.
Now the results are much more concise. It is like a counterweight to the permanent artificial irradiation.
Since this principle is based on quantum entanglement, which means that we are dealing with a remote effect. Not scientifically recognized - but the quanta do not adhere to it.
Quantum entanglement means communication beyond our understanding of space-time. And now we are back to non-linear optics.
That quantum entanglement is real - shows the Nobel Prize in Physics from 2022.
This year's Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Alain Aspect from the University of Paris-Saclay and the École Polytechnique in France, John F. Clauser from J.F. Clauser & Assoc. in Walnut Creek in the USA and Anton Zeilinger from the University of Vienna “for experiments with entangled photons, proof of the violation of Bell's inequality and pioneering work in the field of quantum information”.
Experiments on Bell's inequality
In his experiments, John Francis CLauser used calcium atoms that emitted pairs of entangled photons in opposite directions. The polarization - i.e. the direction of oscillation - of the two particles pointed in the same direction due to the entanglement, but was initially unknown. Only by independently measuring the polarization of the two photons - each with a polarization filter - was this determined. The special thing about this experimental setup was that Clausen and his colleagues varied the angle between the two polarization filters. They found that the probability of a photon passing through the filter depended on the measurement made on the other photon. This confirmed the random nature of quantum mechanics and disproved Albert Einstein's notion of local realism.
It was also referred to as the end of the classical world. It is the experimental proof of the failure of all classical descriptions and images in microphysics. As is so often the case, someone who was regarded as an outsider and an exotic has added an integral part to physics decades later.
This should explain why the LaserCube works.
For your help and support, you will also get access to my Future Targets, Extra Targets and the first blueprint for the LaserCube on my website:
Bitcoin QR-Code
